EAPR vs VYM

EAPR vs VYM

Which is better, EAPR or VYM?

Option Writing against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. EAPR led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEAPRVYM
Expense Ratio0.89%0.04%Best
AUM$103M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings12613
YTD Return+13.46%Best+11.35%
1Y Return+16.26%Best+15.34%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.56%+17.22%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+6.67%+12.30%Best
Volatility (annualized)8.7%Best13.4%
Max Drawdown-17.6%-15.8%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$13,811$17,861Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 31, 2021Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.5 years).

EAPR vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.5 years both funds cover.

EAPR vs VYM Performance

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAPR returned +16.26% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, EAPR is up 13.46% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Over three years, EAPR compounded at +11.56% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.67% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +11.65% annualized vs +5.53%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 8.7% for EAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for EAPR and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EAPR charges 0.89% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $4 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAPR currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EAPR and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EAPRVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EAPR or VYM?

EAPR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EAPR or VYM?

Over the past year EAPR returned +16.26% vs +15.34% for VYM, so EAPR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EAPR annualized +5.53% vs +11.65% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EAPR or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 8.7% for EAPR. Worst drawdown: EAPR -17.6% vs VYM -15.8%.

Should I hold both EAPR and VYM?

EAPR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EAPR or VYM?

EAPR yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than EAPR?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. EAPR led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.