EDGF vs VTI
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EDGF or VTI?
Long Term Low Quality against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDGF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $482M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.22% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 11 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +0.79% | +13.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.31% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.6%Best | 13.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $10,367 | $13,863Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | 3 EDGE Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Low Quality | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 3, 2024 to Sep 23, 2026 (2 years).
EDGF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
EDGF vs VTI Performance
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) is an ETF from 3 EDGE Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDGF returned +1.31% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, EDGF is up 0.79% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 1.6% for EDGF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for EDGF and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDGF charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDGF currently yields 3.22% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 11 holdings in EDGF and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in EDGF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 11 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EDGF (97.5% of the fund), and 10 for EDGF that do not appear in VTI (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDGF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDGF or VTI?
EDGF has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EDGF or VTI?
Over the past year EDGF returned +1.31% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EDGF annualized +1.82% vs +17.74% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EDGF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 1.6% for EDGF. Worst drawdown: EDGF -1.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both EDGF and VTI?
EDGF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDGF or VTI?
EDGF yields 3.22% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EDGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EDGF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.