EDZ vs VYM
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDZ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $21M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.26% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -52.09% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | -67.67% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -49.07% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -29.37% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EDZ vs VYM Performance
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bear 3X ETF (EDZ) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDZ returned -67.67% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, EDZ is down 52.09% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, EDZ compounded at -49.07% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -29.37% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs -40.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for EDZ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDZ charges 1.05% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $4 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDZ currently yields 4.26% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EDZ and VYM share 0 holdings out of 605 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDZ or VYM?
EDZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDZ or VYM?
Over the past year EDZ returned -67.67% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EDZ annualized -40.23% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDZ or VYM?
EDZ has been the more volatile fund at 53.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EDZ -100.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EDZ and VYM?
EDZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDZ and VYM?
EDZ and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 605 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDZ or VYM?
EDZ yields 4.26% while VYM yields 2.24%, so EDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.