EELV vs VTI
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EELV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $425M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 227 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.76% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.67% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.29% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.31% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -47.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
EELV vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EELV returned +11.67% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, EELV is up 5.76% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, EELV compounded at +11.29% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.31% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.2% for EELV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.3% for EELV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EELV charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EELV currently yields 3.82% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EELV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2988 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EELV or VTI?
EELV has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EELV or VTI?
Over the past year EELV returned +11.67% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EELV annualized +2.45% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EELV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.2% for EELV. Worst drawdown: EELV -47.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EELV and VTI?
EELV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EELV and VTI?
EELV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2988 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EELV or VTI?
EELV yields 3.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EELV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.