EET vs IVV
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EET delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EET | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +24.52% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +61.14% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.90% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.31% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2009 | May 15, 2000 |
EET vs IVV Performance
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EET returned +61.14% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, EET is up 24.52% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, EET compounded at +30.90% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.31% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.7% for EET and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EET charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EET currently yields 1.37% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EET and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EET or IVV?
EET has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EET or IVV?
Over the past year EET returned +61.14% vs +23.01% for IVV, so EET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), EET annualized +3.94% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EET or IVV?
EET has been the more volatile fund at 37.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EET -71.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EET and IVV?
EET and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EET and IVV?
EET and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EET or IVV?
EET yields 1.37% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.