EFAV vs QQQ
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EFAV or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EFAV is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $5.5B | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.04% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 277 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +8.74% | +17.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.27% | +24.69%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.86% | +24.76%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.26% | +14.22%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.3% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,547 | $19,441Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.3%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 8, 2026 (14.9 years).
EFAV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
EFAV vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EFAV returned +11.27% while QQQ returned +24.69%. Year to date, EFAV is up 8.74% versus a gain of 17.44% for QQQ.
Over three years, EFAV compounded at +14.86% per year against +24.76% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.26% and +14.22% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.87% annualized vs +7.13%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 11.1% for EFAV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.3% for EFAV and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAV charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAV currently yields 3.04% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of EFAV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings EFAV also owns.
QQQ and EFAV share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 253 positions we hold weights for in EFAV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 277 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EFAV (96.7% of the fund), and 8 for EFAV that do not appear in QQQ (3.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EFAV and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAV or QQQ?
EFAV has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFAV or QQQ?
Over the past year EFAV returned +11.27% vs +24.69% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EFAV annualized +7.13% vs +18.87% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFAV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 11.1% for EFAV. Worst drawdown: EFAV -38.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both EFAV and QQQ?
EFAV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAV and QQQ?
1.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings EFAV also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's is in holdings EFAV also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 253 positions we hold weights for in EFAV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAV or QQQ?
EFAV yields 3.04% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EFAV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EFAV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EFAV is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.