EHI vs QQQ
Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. EHI offers more diversification with 398 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EHI | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.89% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $195M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.19% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 398 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.82% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.06% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.05% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.01% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2003 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EHI vs QQQ Performance
Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc (EHI) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EHI returned +1.06% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, EHI is down 0.82% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, EHI compounded at +6.05% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.01% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs -1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.3% for EHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.1% for EHI and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EHI charges 1.89% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $189 vs $18 annually, a gap of $171 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EHI currently yields 13.19% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EHI and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 361 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EHI or QQQ?
EHI has an expense ratio of 1.89% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $171 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EHI or QQQ?
Over the past year EHI returned +1.06% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), EHI annualized -1.31% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EHI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.3% for EHI. Worst drawdown: EHI -66.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EHI and QQQ?
EHI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EHI and QQQ?
EHI and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 361 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EHI or QQQ?
EHI yields 13.19% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.