ELCV vs FAAR
Eventide High Dividend ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. ELCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. ELCV offers more diversification with 46 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ELCV | FAAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.97% | |
| AUM | $251M | $191M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 9.19% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +18.65% | +13.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.13% | +19.26% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 9.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -18.8% | |
| Fund Family | Eventide | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2024 | May 18, 2016 |
ELCV vs FAAR Performance
Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) is a ETF from Eventide and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year ELCV returned +25.13% while FAAR returned +19.26%. Year to date, ELCV is up 18.65% versus a gain of 13.94% for FAAR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ELCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 9.2% for FAAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for ELCV and -18.8% for FAAR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ELCV charges 0.49% per year while FAAR charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $97 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ELCV currently yields 2.06% against 9.19% for FAAR.
Holdings Overlap
ELCV and FAAR share 0 holdings out of 47 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ELCV or FAAR?
ELCV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while FAAR charges 0.97%. ELCV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ELCV or FAAR?
Over the past year ELCV returned +25.13% vs +19.26% for FAAR, so ELCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ELCV annualized +15.23% vs +3.32% for FAAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ELCV or FAAR?
ELCV has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 9.2% for FAAR. Worst drawdown: ELCV -18.4% vs FAAR -18.8%.
Should I hold both ELCV and FAAR?
ELCV and FAAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ELCV and FAAR?
ELCV and FAAR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 47 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ELCV or FAAR?
ELCV yields 2.06% while FAAR yields 9.19%, so FAAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.