ENZL vs VTI
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENZL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $82M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.15% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.27% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.99% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.36% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 1, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
ENZL vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ENZL returned +9.27% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, ENZL is up 8.15% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, ENZL compounded at +4.99% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -2.36% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENZL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for ENZL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENZL charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENZL currently yields 2.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ENZL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2812 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ENZL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCL | 1.39% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENZL or VTI?
ENZL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ENZL or VTI?
Over the past year ENZL returned +9.27% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ENZL annualized +4.79% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ENZL or VTI?
ENZL has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ENZL -42.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ENZL and VTI?
ENZL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ENZL and VTI?
ENZL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2812 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENZL or VTI?
ENZL yields 2.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ENZL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.