EPU vs IVV
iShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EPU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $543M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.95% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +23.14% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +72.36% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +45.02% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +32.69% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2009 | May 15, 2000 |
EPU vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF (EPU) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EPU returned +72.36% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, EPU is up 23.14% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, EPU compounded at +45.02% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +32.69% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, EPU has the edge at +9.18% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EPU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.6% for EPU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPU charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPU currently yields 1.95% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EPU and IVV share 1 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EPU | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.22% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPU or IVV?
EPU has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EPU or IVV?
Over the past year EPU returned +72.36% vs +22.02% for IVV, so EPU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), EPU annualized +9.18% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EPU or IVV?
EPU has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EPU -64.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EPU and IVV?
EPU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EPU and IVV?
EPU and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPU or IVV?
EPU yields 1.95% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EPU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.