EQLT vs VTI
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EQLT or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EQLT led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQLT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.36% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 323 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +27.80%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +46.97%Best | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.83% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.83% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.8% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,067 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 25, 2014 to Sep 4, 2026 (12.5 years).
EQLT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.5 years both funds cover.
EQLT vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EQLT returned +46.97% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, EQLT is up 27.80% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, EQLT compounded at +3.83% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.83% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.23% annualized vs +3.81%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EQLT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.8% for EQLT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQLT charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQLT currently yields 2.36% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of EQLT's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 299 positions we hold weights for in EQLT and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 323 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EQLT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Co. | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.09% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EQLT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQLT or VTI?
EQLT has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EQLT or VTI?
Over the past year EQLT returned +46.97% vs +20.00% for VTI, so EQLT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), EQLT annualized +3.81% vs +12.23% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EQLT or VTI?
EQLT has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EQLT -45.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EQLT and VTI?
EQLT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQLT or VTI?
EQLT yields 2.36% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EQLT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EQLT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EQLT led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.