ETHU vs MSFO
2x Ether ETF vs YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, ETHU or MSFO?
MSFO has been ahead.
MSFO has a lower expense ratio. MSFO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETHU | MSFO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.97% | 1.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $87M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 38.50% |
| Holdings | 4 | 30 |
| YTD Return | -58.60% | +12.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | -78.27% | +5.56%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 152.9% | 25.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -96.5% | -29.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $793 | $12,658Best |
| Fund Family | Volatility Shares, LLC | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Aug 24, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.4 years).
ETHU vs MSFO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
ETHU vs MSFO Performance
2x Ether ETF (ETHU) is an ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC and YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year ETHU returned -78.27% while MSFO returned +5.56%. Year to date, ETHU is down 58.60% versus a gain of 12.40% for MSFO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 152.9% compared with 25.4% for MSFO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.5% for ETHU and -29.6% for MSFO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETHU charges 2.97% per year while MSFO charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $297 vs $103 annually, a gap of $194 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETHU currently yields 1.52% against 38.50% for MSFO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETHU and MSFO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETHU or MSFO?
ETHU has an expense ratio of 2.97% while MSFO charges 1.03%. MSFO is the cheaper option, by $194 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ETHU or MSFO?
Over the past year ETHU returned -78.27% vs +5.56% for MSFO, so MSFO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETHU annualized -65.21% vs +10.32% for MSFO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ETHU or MSFO?
ETHU has been the more volatile fund at 152.9% annualized versus 25.4% for MSFO. Worst drawdown: ETHU -96.5% vs MSFO -29.6%.
Should I hold both ETHU and MSFO?
ETHU and MSFO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETHU or MSFO?
ETHU yields 1.52% while MSFO yields 38.50%, so MSFO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSFO better than ETHU?
MSFO has a lower expense ratio. MSFO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.