ETQ vs IVV
T-REX 2X INVERSE ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ETQ or IVV?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETQ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 143.8% | 11.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -95.9% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $923 | $11,746Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 22, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 186 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ETQ has data through Mar 16, 2026 and IVV through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Mar 16, 2026 (1.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 143.8% compared with 11.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.9% for ETQ and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETQ charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETQ currently yields 0.20% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ETQ and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETQ or IVV?
ETQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ETQ or IVV?
ETQ has been the more volatile fund at 143.8% annualized versus 11.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ETQ -95.9% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both ETQ and IVV?
ETQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETQ or IVV?
ETQ yields 0.20% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ETQ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.