EVG vs VTI
Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EVG or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EVG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $442M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.06% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 740 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -0.35% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.07% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.68% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.71% | +11.52%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.0%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,430 | $17,249Best |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 28, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 29, 2005 to Sep 16, 2026 (21.5 years).
EVG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EVG vs VTI Performance
Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EVG returned -2.07% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, EVG is down 0.35% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, EVG compounded at +8.68% per year against +20.48% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.71% and +11.52% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.54% annualized vs -0.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 10.8% for EVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.0% for EVG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EVG charges 1.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EVG currently yields 8.06% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 247 holdings in EVG and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 37.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. That is not enough of EVG to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 181 days apart, EVG as of Jan 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 247 positions we hold weights for in EVG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 740 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EVG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKILSkillsoft Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EVG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EVG or VTI?
EVG has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EVG or VTI?
Over the past year EVG returned -2.07% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), EVG annualized -0.65% vs +9.54% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EVG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 10.8% for EVG. Worst drawdown: EVG -53.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EVG and VTI?
EVG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EVG or VTI?
EVG yields 8.06% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EVG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.