EWH vs VTI
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EWH or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | +13.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.01% | +21.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.52% | +21.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.11% | +11.77%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -64.7% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,567 | $17,443Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 3, 2026 (25.3 years).
EWH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
EWH vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWH returned +14.01% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, EWH is up 6.77% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Over three years, EWH compounded at +12.52% per year against +21.10% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.11% and +11.77% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +3.85%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.7% for EWH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWH charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWH currently yields 4.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 26 holdings in EWH and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.0% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in EWH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 34 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EWH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWH or VTI?
EWH has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EWH or VTI?
Over the past year EWH returned +14.01% vs +21.44% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), EWH annualized +3.85% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EWH or VTI?
EWH has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWH -64.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EWH and VTI?
EWH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWH or VTI?
EWH yields 4.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EWH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EWH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.