EWH vs VTI
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.03% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.84% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.28% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | May 24, 2001 |
EWH vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWH returned +9.84% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, EWH is up 4.03% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, EWH compounded at +11.39% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.28% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.3% for EWH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWH charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWH currently yields 4.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EWH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWH or VTI?
EWH has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EWH or VTI?
Over the past year EWH returned +9.84% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), EWH annualized +2.28% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EWH or VTI?
EWH has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWH -69.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EWH and VTI?
EWH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EWH and VTI?
EWH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWH or VTI?
EWH yields 4.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EWH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.