EWI vs VTI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EWI or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EWI led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | +11.06% |
| 1Y Return | +20.03%Best | +15.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.88%Best | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.40%Best | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -75.1% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,302Best | $17,249 |
| Top 10 Weight | 72.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 16, 2026 (25.3 years).
EWI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
EWI vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWI returned +20.03% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, EWI is up 12.01% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, EWI compounded at +28.88% per year against +20.48% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +17.40% and +11.52% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +7.99% annualized vs +2.72%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.1% for EWI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWI charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWI currently yields 3.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
2.7% of EWI's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
EWI and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in EWI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EWI (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for EWI that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EWI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FBKFb Financial Corp | 2.66% | 0.00% | 2.66% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EWI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWI or VTI?
EWI has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EWI or VTI?
Over the past year EWI returned +20.03% vs +15.41% for VTI, so EWI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), EWI annualized +2.72% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EWI or VTI?
EWI has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWI -75.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EWI and VTI?
EWI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EWI and VTI?
2.7% of EWI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings EWI also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in EWI and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWI or VTI?
EWI yields 3.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EWI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EWI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EWI led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.