EWM vs IVV
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EWM or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $325M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.56% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 26 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.79% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.91% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.39% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.21% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -71.5% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,891 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 74.0% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2000 to Sep 4, 2026 (26.3 years).
EWM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.3 years both funds cover.
EWM vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EWM returned +16.91% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, EWM is up 4.79% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, EWM compounded at +14.39% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.21% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +0.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.5% for EWM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWM charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWM currently yields 3.56% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of EWM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EWM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EWM and 504 in IVV, against full books of 26 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EWM (99.0% of the fund), and 0 for EWM that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EWM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.53% | 0.18% | 0.35% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EWM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWM or IVV?
EWM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EWM or IVV?
Over the past year EWM returned +16.91% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), EWM annualized +0.76% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EWM or IVV?
EWM has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EWM -71.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EWM and IVV?
EWM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWM or IVV?
EWM yields 3.56% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EWM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EWM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.