EWN vs IVV
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EWN or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EWN led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $618M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.14% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 60 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.94%Best | +12.24% |
| 1Y Return | +32.67%Best | +18.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.19%Best | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.86% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -68.2% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,598 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.8% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 12, 1996 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2000 to Sep 9, 2026 (26.3 years).
EWN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.3 years both funds cover.
EWN vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EWN returned +32.67% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, EWN is up 17.94% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, EWN compounded at +23.19% per year against +20.98% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.86% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs +4.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.2% for EWN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWN charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWN currently yields 4.14% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
1.8% of EWN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EWN also owns.
EWN and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in EWN and 505 in IVV, against full books of 60 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EWN (99.2% of the fund), and 1 for EWN that do not appear in IVV (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EWN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWN or IVV?
EWN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EWN or IVV?
Over the past year EWN returned +32.67% vs +18.61% for IVV, so EWN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), EWN annualized +4.75% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EWN or IVV?
EWN has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EWN -68.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EWN and IVV?
EWN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EWN and IVV?
1.8% of EWN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's is in holdings EWN also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 56 positions we hold weights for in EWN and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWN or IVV?
EWN yields 4.14% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EWN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EWN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EWN led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.