EWZS vs VTI
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EWZS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $208M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.86% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -3.63% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.13% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.13% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.12% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
EWZS vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EWZS returned +4.13% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, EWZS is down 3.63% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, EWZS compounded at -1.13% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -2.12% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -3.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EWZS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.7% for EWZS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EWZS charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EWZS currently yields 3.86% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EWZS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2860 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EWZS or VTI?
EWZS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EWZS or VTI?
Over the past year EWZS returned +4.13% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EWZS annualized -3.24% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EWZS or VTI?
EWZS has been the more volatile fund at 33.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EWZS -81.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EWZS and VTI?
EWZS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EWZS and VTI?
EWZS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2860 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EWZS or VTI?
EWZS yields 3.86% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EWZS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.