EYEG vs IVV
AB Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EYEG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.02% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 317 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.67% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.69% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
EYEG vs IVV Performance
AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EYEG returned +1.69% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, EYEG is down 0.67% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.7% for EYEG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for EYEG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EYEG charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EYEG currently yields 5.02% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EYEG and IVV share 1 holdings out of 733 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EYEG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE | 0.34% | 0.55% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EYEG or IVV?
EYEG has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EYEG or IVV?
Over the past year EYEG returned +1.69% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), EYEG annualized +4.28% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EYEG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.7% for EYEG. Worst drawdown: EYEG -4.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EYEG and IVV?
EYEG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EYEG and IVV?
EYEG and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 733 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EYEG or IVV?
EYEG yields 5.02% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EYEG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.