FAAR vs SPY
FAAR vs SPY
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAAR | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $191M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.19% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +13.94% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.26% | +23.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.78% | +21.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.33% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2016 | Jan 22, 1993 |
FAAR vs SPY Performance
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year FAAR returned +19.26% while SPY returned +23.66%. Year to date, FAAR is up 13.94% versus a gain of 13.79% for SPY.
Over three years, FAAR compounded at +8.78% per year against +21.40% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +7.33% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.85% annualized vs +3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.2% for FAAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for FAAR and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FAAR charges 0.97% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $9 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAAR currently yields 9.19% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
FAAR and SPY share 0 holdings out of 504 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FAAR or SPY?
FAAR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $88 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FAAR or SPY?
Over the past year FAAR returned +19.26% vs +23.66% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FAAR annualized +3.32% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FAAR or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.2% for FAAR. Worst drawdown: FAAR -18.8% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both FAAR and SPY?
FAAR and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FAAR and SPY?
FAAR and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 504 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FAAR or SPY?
FAAR yields 9.19% while SPY yields 1.01%, so FAAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.