FAZ vs IVV
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FAZ or IVV?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.81, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $99M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.62% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 8 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -11.50% | +11.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.49% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -40.32% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -30.35% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.3% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $1,639 | $18,149Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2008 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2008 to Sep 15, 2026 (17.9 years).
FAZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FAZ vs IVV Performance
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X ETF (FAZ) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FAZ returned -17.49% while IVV returned +15.96%. Year to date, FAZ is down 11.50% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.
Over three years, FAZ compounded at -40.32% per year against +21.01% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -30.35% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.12% annualized vs -52.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FAZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.3% compared with 14.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FAZ charges 1.03% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $3 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAZ currently yields 2.62% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in FAZ and 490 in IVV, totalling 102.2% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in FAZ and 490 in IVV, against full books of 8 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FAZ and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FAZ or IVV?
FAZ has an expense ratio of 1.03% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $100 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FAZ or IVV?
Over the past year FAZ returned -17.49% vs +15.96% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), FAZ annualized -52.49% vs +13.12% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FAZ or IVV?
FAZ has been the more volatile fund at 53.3% annualized versus 14.9% for IVV.
Should I hold both FAZ and IVV?
FAZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FAZ or IVV?
FAZ yields 2.62% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FAZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FAZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.81, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.