FCSH vs VTI
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCSH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $65M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 175 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.01% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.15% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.29% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
FCSH vs VTI Performance
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FCSH returned +3.15% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, FCSH is up 1.01% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, FCSH compounded at +5.29% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 3.2% for FCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for FCSH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCSH charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCSH currently yields 4.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FCSH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2926 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCSH or VTI?
FCSH has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FCSH or VTI?
Over the past year FCSH returned +3.15% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FCSH annualized +2.46% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FCSH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 3.2% for FCSH. Worst drawdown: FCSH -8.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FCSH and VTI?
FCSH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FCSH and VTI?
FCSH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2926 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCSH or VTI?
FCSH yields 4.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.