FEMD vs VYM

FEMD vs VYM

Which is better, FEMD or VYM?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. FEMD is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: FEMD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEMDVYM
Expense Ratio0.55%0.04%Best
AUM$4M$83.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings69608
YTD Return-1.57%+10.00%Best
1Y Return-+13.75%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.81%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.63%
Top 10 Weight23.0%Best26.1%
Fund FamilyFirst Eagle InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionJan 27, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FEMD vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FEMD vs VYM Performance

First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF (FEMD) is an ETF from First Eagle Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FEMD is down 1.57% versus a gain of 10.00% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEMD charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMD currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

FEMD already in VYM40.5%
VYM already in FEMD2.3%

40.5% of FEMD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.3% of VYM's money is in holdings FEMD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

24 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in FEMD and 557 in VYM, against full books of 69 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 504 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FEMD (94.8% of the fund), and 39 for FEMD that do not appear in VYM (52.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FEMDWeight in VYMDifference
PRPermian Resource2.66%0.07%2.59%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred2.36%0.23%2.13%
PSXPhillips 662.23%0.34%1.89%
OKEOneok Inc.2.00%0.23%1.77%
DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc2.00%0.10%1.90%
RFRegions Financia1.97%0.11%1.86%
VOYAVoya Financial Inc1.88%0.04%1.84%
LPXLouisiana-Pacific Corp1.88%0.02%1.86%
RJFRaymond James Financial Inc.1.77%0.12%1.65%
FLSFlowserve Corp.1.84%0.04%1.80%

40.5% of FEMD is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FEMDVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEMD or VYM?

FEMD has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FEMD and VYM?

40.5% of FEMD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.3% of VYM's is in holdings FEMD also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in FEMD and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEMD or VYM?

FEMD yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than FEMD?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. FEMD is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.