FFEB vs QQQ
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - February vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFEB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +9.95% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.96% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.74% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.98% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 21, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FFEB vs QQQ Performance
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FFEB returned +16.96% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, FFEB is up 9.95% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, FFEB compounded at +15.74% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.98% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.5% for FFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for FFEB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFEB charges 0.85% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $18 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FFEB and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFEB or QQQ?
FFEB has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFEB or QQQ?
Over the past year FFEB returned +16.96% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FFEB annualized +11.92% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFEB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.5% for FFEB. Worst drawdown: FFEB -22.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FFEB and QQQ?
FFEB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFEB and QQQ?
FFEB and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFEB or QQQ?
FFEB yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.