FFOX vs VTI
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FFOX or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. FFOX is less concentrated, with 24.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $232M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 74 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.04% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.41% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,499 | $13,000Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | FundX Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 10, 2025 to Sep 25, 2026 (1.3 years).
FFOX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
FFOX vs VTI Performance
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) is an ETF from FundX Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFOX returned +6.41% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, FFOX is up 3.04% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for FFOX and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOX charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOX currently yields 1.69% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
88.8% of FFOX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings FFOX also owns.
Most of FFOX is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
65 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in FFOX and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 74 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,099 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FFOX (96.7% of the fund), and 3 for FFOX that do not appear in VTI (6.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOX | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHGuardant Health, Inc | 2.82% | 0.03% | 2.79% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 2.54% | 0.05% | 2.49% |
| HALOHalozyme Therapeutics Inc | 2.32% | 0.01% | 2.31% |
| PSTGPure Storage Inc. Class A | 2.13% | 0.03% | 2.10% |
| IDCCInterdigital Inc | 1.98% | 0.01% | 1.97% |
| GMEDGlobus Medical, Inc. (class A) | 1.95% | 0.01% | 1.94% |
| LFUSLittelfuse Inc | 1.92% | 0.02% | 1.90% |
| FCFSFirstcash Inc | 1.92% | 0.01% | 1.91% |
| IONSIonis Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1.88% | 0.01% | 1.87% |
| LGNDLigand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1.83% | 0.01% | 1.82% |
88.8% of FFOX is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOX or VTI?
FFOX has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOX or VTI?
Over the past year FFOX returned +6.41% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FFOX annualized +11.34% vs +22.36% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOX or VTI?
FFOX has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFOX -12.4% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both FFOX and VTI?
FFOX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOX and VTI?
88.8% of FFOX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's is in holdings FFOX also owns. They hold 65 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in FFOX and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOX or VTI?
FFOX yields 1.69% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FFOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FFOX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. FFOX is less concentrated, with 24.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.