FJP vs VTI
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FJP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $262M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.58% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.42% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.98% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.73% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
FJP vs VTI Performance
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FJP returned +20.42% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, FJP is up 13.72% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, FJP compounded at +19.98% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.73% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.0% for FJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.9% for FJP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FJP charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FJP currently yields 2.58% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FJP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2887 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FJP or VTI?
FJP has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FJP or VTI?
Over the past year FJP returned +20.42% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), FJP annualized +5.04% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FJP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.0% for FJP. Worst drawdown: FJP -43.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FJP and VTI?
FJP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FJP and VTI?
FJP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2887 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FJP or VTI?
FJP yields 2.58% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.