FLGV vs GLOW
FLGV vs GLOW
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FLGV offers more diversification with 41 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | GLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.72% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $63M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 1.28% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 16 | |
| YTD Return | -0.55% | +14.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.27% | +25.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.06% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.55% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0% | 10.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -15.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2020 | Jun 21, 2024 |
FLGV vs GLOW Performance
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year FLGV returned +1.27% while GLOW returned +25.58%. Year to date, FLGV is down 0.55% versus a gain of 14.31% for GLOW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 5.0% for FLGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for FLGV and -15.6% for GLOW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGV charges 0.09% per year while GLOW charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $72 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGV currently yields 4.11% against 1.28% for GLOW.
Holdings Overlap
FLGV and GLOW share 0 holdings out of 56 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGV or GLOW?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while GLOW charges 0.72%. FLGV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGV or GLOW?
Over the past year FLGV returned +1.27% vs +25.58% for GLOW, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLGV annualized -0.92% vs +19.77% for GLOW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGV or GLOW?
GLOW has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 5.0% for FLGV. Worst drawdown: FLGV -18.4% vs GLOW -15.6%.
Should I hold both FLGV and GLOW?
FLGV and GLOW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGV and GLOW?
FLGV and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 56 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGV or GLOW?
FLGV yields 4.11% while GLOW yields 1.28%, so FLGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.