FLGV vs IG
FLGV vs IG
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. FLGV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 145 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGV | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $198M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 5.07% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 248 | |
| YTD Return | -0.55% | -1.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.27% | +0.84% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.06% | +4.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.55% | -0.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -23.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Principal Funds | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2020 | Apr 18, 2018 |
FLGV vs IG Performance
Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF (IG) is a ETF from Principal Funds. Over the past year FLGV returned +1.27% while IG returned +0.84%. Year to date, FLGV is down 0.55% versus a loss of 1.54% for IG.
Over three years, FLGV compounded at +3.06% per year against +4.56% for IG; over five years the annualized figures are -0.55% and -0.69% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IG has the edge at +0.59% annualized vs -0.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.0% compared with 5.0% for FLGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for FLGV and -23.8% for IG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGV charges 0.09% per year while IG charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $19 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGV currently yields 4.11% against 5.07% for IG.
Holdings Overlap
FLGV and IG share 0 holdings out of 186 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGV or IG?
FLGV has an expense ratio of 0.09% while IG charges 0.19%. FLGV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGV or IG?
Over the past year FLGV returned +1.27% vs +0.84% for IG, so FLGV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FLGV annualized -0.92% vs +0.59% for IG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGV or IG?
IG has been the more volatile fund at 8.0% annualized versus 5.0% for FLGV. Worst drawdown: FLGV -18.4% vs IG -23.8%.
Should I hold both FLGV and IG?
FLGV and IG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGV and IG?
FLGV and IG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 186 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGV or IG?
FLGV yields 4.11% while IG yields 5.07%, so IG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.