FLJJ vs VTI
AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FLJJ or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJJ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.12% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.13% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.1%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $13,583 | $15,857Best |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.6 years).
FLJJ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
FLJJ vs VTI Performance
AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJJ returned +10.13% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, FLJJ is up 7.12% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 6.1% for FLJJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for FLJJ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJJ charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJJ currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLJJ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJJ or VTI?
FLJJ has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLJJ or VTI?
Over the past year FLJJ returned +10.13% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLJJ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 6.1% for FLJJ. Worst drawdown: FLJJ -6.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FLJJ and VTI?
FLJJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJJ or VTI?
FLJJ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FLJJ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.