FMHI vs VYM

FMHI vs VYM
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. FMHI offers more diversification with 736 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: FMHI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFMHIVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.49%0.04%
AUM$1.0B$81.6B
Dividend Yield4.35%2.24%
Holdings736616
YTD Return+1.31%+15.34%
1Y Return+6.78%+23.24%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.87%+19.22%
5Y Return (annualized)+0.23%+12.21%
Volatility (annualized)7.2%14.6%
Max Drawdown-18.8%-58.8%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryTax PreferredEquity
InceptionNov 2, 2017Nov 10, 2006

FMHI vs VYM Performance

First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMHI returned +6.78% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, FMHI is up 1.31% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.

Over three years, FMHI compounded at +4.87% per year against +19.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.23% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 7.2% for FMHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for FMHI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FMHI charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMHI currently yields 4.35% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

FMHI and VYM share 0 holdings out of 1091 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FMHI or VYM?

FMHI has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FMHI or VYM?

Over the past year FMHI returned +6.78% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FMHI annualized +1.71% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FMHI or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 7.2% for FMHI. Worst drawdown: FMHI -18.8% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both FMHI and VYM?

FMHI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FMHI and VYM?

FMHI and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1091 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FMHI or VYM?

FMHI yields 4.35% while VYM yields 2.24%, so FMHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free