FNG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long FN Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $494,774.75 | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -16.17% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.17% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 54.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -75.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
FNG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long FN Daily ETF (FNG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNG returned -16.17% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, FNG is down 16.17% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 54.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.6% for FNG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNG charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNG currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FNG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNG or VTI?
FNG has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNG or VTI?
Over the past year FNG returned -16.17% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FNG annualized -6.93% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNG or VTI?
FNG has been the more volatile fund at 54.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNG -75.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FNG and VTI?
FNG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNG and VTI?
FNG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNG or VTI?
FNG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.