FNK vs QQQ

FNK vs QQQ

Which is better, FNK or QQQ?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FNK led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFNKQQQ
Expense Ratio0.74%0.18%Best
AUM$238M$437.3B
Dividend Yield1.53%0.43%
Holdings453208
YTD Return+16.80%Best+12.98%
1Y Return+22.04%Best+11.59%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.56%+23.05%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.10%+12.74%Best
Volatility (annualized)20.4%17.5%Best
Max Drawdown-52.1%-35.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$14,761$18,213Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Growth
InceptionApr 19, 2011Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2011 to Nov 11, 2026 (15.6 years).

FNK vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.6 years both funds cover.

FNK vs QQQ Performance

First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FNK returned +22.04% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, FNK is up 16.80% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.

Over three years, FNK compounded at +16.56% per year against +23.05% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.10% and +12.74% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +17.52% annualized vs +8.39%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FNK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 17.5% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.1% for FNK and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FNK charges 0.74% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $18 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNK currently yields 1.53% against 0.43% for QQQ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FNK and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FNKQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FNK or QQQ?

FNK has an expense ratio of 0.74% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FNK or QQQ?

Over the past year FNK returned +22.04% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so FNK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), FNK annualized +8.39% vs +17.52% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FNK or QQQ?

FNK has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 17.5% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FNK -52.1% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both FNK and QQQ?

FNK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FNK or QQQ?

FNK yields 1.53% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so FNK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than FNK?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FNK led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.