FQAL vs GLOW
FQAL vs GLOW
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 125 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | GLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.72% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $63M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 1.28% | |
| Holdings | 129 | 16 | |
| YTD Return | +13.20% | +14.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.81% | +25.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.86% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.09% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 10.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -15.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Jun 21, 2024 |
FQAL vs GLOW Performance
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year FQAL returned +20.81% while GLOW returned +25.58%. Year to date, FQAL is up 13.20% versus a gain of 14.31% for GLOW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FQAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for FQAL and -15.6% for GLOW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FQAL charges 0.15% per year while GLOW charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $72 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FQAL currently yields 1.17% against 1.28% for GLOW.
Holdings Overlap
FQAL and GLOW share 0 holdings out of 140 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FQAL or GLOW?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while GLOW charges 0.72%. FQAL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FQAL or GLOW?
Over the past year FQAL returned +20.81% vs +25.58% for GLOW, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FQAL annualized +13.89% vs +19.77% for GLOW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FQAL or GLOW?
FQAL has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: FQAL -34.1% vs GLOW -15.6%.
Should I hold both FQAL and GLOW?
FQAL and GLOW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FQAL and GLOW?
FQAL and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 140 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FQAL or GLOW?
FQAL yields 1.17% while GLOW yields 1.28%, so GLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.