FRDM vs IVV
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FRDM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FRDM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.3B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 134 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +25.77% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +59.76% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.27% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.65% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Freedom ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 23, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
FRDM vs IVV Performance
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) is a ETF from Freedom ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FRDM returned +59.76% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, FRDM is up 25.77% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, FRDM compounded at +31.27% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +16.65% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, FRDM has the edge at +16.45% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FRDM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.5% for FRDM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FRDM charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRDM currently yields 1.53% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FRDM and IVV share 0 holdings out of 632 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FRDM or IVV?
FRDM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FRDM or IVV?
Over the past year FRDM returned +59.76% vs +23.01% for IVV, so FRDM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FRDM annualized +16.45% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FRDM or IVV?
FRDM has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FRDM -40.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FRDM and IVV?
FRDM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FRDM and IVV?
FRDM and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 632 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FRDM or IVV?
FRDM yields 1.53% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FRDM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.