FTGS vs GLOW
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
FTGS has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 50 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | GLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.72% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $63M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 1.28% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 16 | |
| YTD Return | +13.02% | +14.61% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.71% | +24.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.46% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 10.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -15.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2022 | Jun 21, 2024 |
FTGS vs GLOW Performance
First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year FTGS returned +14.71% while GLOW returned +24.02%. Year to date, FTGS is up 13.02% versus a gain of 14.61% for GLOW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for FTGS and -15.6% for GLOW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTGS charges 0.60% per year while GLOW charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $72 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTGS currently yields 0.09% against 1.28% for GLOW.
Holdings Overlap
FTGS and GLOW share 0 holdings out of 65 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTGS or GLOW?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while GLOW charges 0.72%. FTGS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTGS or GLOW?
Over the past year FTGS returned +14.71% vs +24.02% for GLOW, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FTGS annualized +19.91% vs +19.78% for GLOW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTGS or GLOW?
FTGS has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: FTGS -20.0% vs GLOW -15.6%.
Should I hold both FTGS and GLOW?
FTGS and GLOW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTGS and GLOW?
FTGS and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 65 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTGS or GLOW?
FTGS yields 0.09% while GLOW yields 1.28%, so GLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.