FTGS vs GTOS
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. FTGS delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 703 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGS | GTOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $124M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 4.52% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 703 | |
| YTD Return | +11.16% | -0.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.59% | +1.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.19% | +4.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 1.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2022 | Dec 9, 2022 |
FTGS vs GTOS Performance
First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FTGS returned +12.59% while GTOS returned +1.17%. Year to date, FTGS is up 11.16% versus a loss of 0.74% for GTOS.
Over three years, FTGS compounded at +18.19% per year against +4.69% for GTOS. Across the full 4-year window we track, FTGS has the edge at +19.27% annualized vs +4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for FTGS and -1.8% for GTOS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTGS charges 0.60% per year while GTOS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $30 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTGS currently yields 0.08% against 4.52% for GTOS.
Holdings Overlap
FTGS and GTOS share 0 holdings out of 309 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTGS or GTOS?
FTGS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while GTOS charges 0.30%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTGS or GTOS?
Over the past year FTGS returned +12.59% vs +1.17% for GTOS, so FTGS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FTGS annualized +19.27% vs +4.30% for GTOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTGS or GTOS?
FTGS has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: FTGS -20.0% vs GTOS -1.8%.
Should I hold both FTGS and GTOS?
FTGS and GTOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTGS and GTOS?
FTGS and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 309 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTGS or GTOS?
FTGS yields 0.08% while GTOS yields 4.52%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.