FXC vs IVV
Invesco CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $69M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -1.28% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.80% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.01% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.22% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
FXC vs IVV Performance
Invesco CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FXC returned -0.80% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, FXC is down 1.28% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, FXC compounded at +0.01% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.22% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -0.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.7% for FXC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.9% for FXC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXC charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXC currently yields 0.27% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXC or IVV?
FXC has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FXC or IVV?
Over the past year FXC returned -0.80% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), FXC annualized -0.94% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FXC or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.7% for FXC. Worst drawdown: FXC -37.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FXC and IVV?
FXC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXC or IVV?
FXC yields 0.27% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.