GBF vs VTI
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GBF or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $107M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 3,287 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 13.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -2.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $9,790 | $18,428Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 5, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 18 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GBF has data through Aug 31, 2026 and VTI through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2023 to Aug 31, 2026 (3.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.1% for GBF and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBF charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBF currently yields 3.82% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings GBF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GBF, our book for it covers 83.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
7 positions in common, counted across the 3,068 positions we hold weights for in GBF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 3,287 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GBF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEGeneral Electric Co 6.75% 03/15/2032 | 0.01% | 0.52% | 0.51% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa, Inc. 3.875% 15-Apr-2030 | 0.02% | 0.10% | 0.08% |
| AONAon Corp/Aon Glo 5.35 02/28/2033 | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| KDPKEURig Dr Pepper Inc Company Guar 04/29 3.95 | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.05% |
| SFStifel Financial Corp 4.00% 2030-05-15 | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| NOVNov Inc 3.6% 12/01/2029 | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| NNNNational Retail Prop Inc 3.5 04/15/2051 | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GBF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBF or VTI?
GBF has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBF or VTI?
GBF yields 3.82% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GBF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GBF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.