GCPB vs LSCP
Goldman Sachs Core Plus Bond ETF vs Natixis Loomis Sayles Dynamic Core Plus ETF
Which is better, GCPB or LSCP?
GCPB costs less.
GCPB has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCPB | LSCP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $155M | $51M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 724 | 845 |
| YTD Return | -1.16%Best | -2.38% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Natixis Funds |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Nov 30, 2006 | Jun 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
GCPB vs LSCP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GCPB vs LSCP Performance
Goldman Sachs Core Plus Bond ETF (GCPB) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Natixis Loomis Sayles Dynamic Core Plus ETF (LSCP) is an ETF from Natixis Funds. Year to date, GCPB is down 1.16% versus a loss of 2.38% for LSCP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCPB charges 0.35% per year while LSCP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $39 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCPB currently yields 0.65% against 1.30% for LSCP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 112 holdings in GCPB and 211 in LSCP, totalling 30.7% and 29.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
2 positions in common, counted across the 112 positions we hold weights for in GCPB and 211 in LSCP, against full books of 724 and 845.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GCPB | Weight in LSCP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA 6.858 05/01/54Boeing Co/The Corporate Bonds | 0.23% | 0.06% | 0.17% |
| ET 5.4 10/01/47Energy Transfer Lp 5.4 10/01/2047 | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.03% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GCPB and LSCP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCPB or LSCP?
GCPB has an expense ratio of 0.35% while LSCP charges 0.39%. GCPB is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCPB or LSCP?
GCPB yields 0.65% while LSCP yields 1.30%, so LSCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSCP better than GCPB?
GCPB has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.