GLGG vs VYM
Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLGG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | -57.83% | +14.18% | |
| 1Y Return | -67.79% | +20.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 182.0% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GLGG vs VYM Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLGG returned -67.79% while VYM returned +20.67%. Year to date, GLGG is down 57.83% versus a gain of 14.18% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 182.0% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.2% for GLGG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLGG charges 0.76% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $4 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLGG currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GLGG and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLGG or VYM?
GLGG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLGG or VYM?
Over the past year GLGG returned -67.79% vs +20.67% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLGG annualized -66.59% vs +6.97% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLGG or VYM?
GLGG has been the more volatile fund at 182.0% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLGG -92.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GLGG and VYM?
GLGG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLGG and VYM?
GLGG and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLGG or VYM?
GLGG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.