GLL vs VYM
ProShares UltraShort Gold vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $88M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | -11.39% | +14.18% | |
| 1Y Return | -40.88% | +20.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -42.05% | +18.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -29.38% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.4% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GLL vs VYM Performance
ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLL returned -40.88% while VYM returned +20.67%. Year to date, GLL is down 11.39% versus a gain of 14.18% for VYM.
Over three years, GLL compounded at -42.05% per year against +18.47% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -29.38% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs -22.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.4% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.2% for GLL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLL charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLL currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GLL and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLL or VYM?
GLL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLL or VYM?
Over the past year GLL returned -40.88% vs +20.67% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), GLL annualized -22.34% vs +6.97% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLL or VYM?
GLL has been the more volatile fund at 32.4% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLL -99.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GLL and VYM?
GLL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLL and VYM?
GLL and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLL or VYM?
GLL yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.