GLNK vs VTI
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
GLNK has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLNK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $92M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -12.30% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -80.12% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -10.15% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 154.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
GLNK vs VTI Performance
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) is a ETF from Grayscale and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLNK returned -80.12% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GLNK is down 12.30% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, GLNK compounded at -10.15% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLNK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 154.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for GLNK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLNK charges 0.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLNK currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLNK or VTI?
GLNK has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. GLNK is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLNK or VTI?
Over the past year GLNK returned -80.12% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GLNK annualized +6.53% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLNK or VTI?
GLNK has been the more volatile fund at 154.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GLNK -96.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GLNK and VTI?
GLNK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLNK or VTI?
GLNK yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.