GMAR vs HTUS

GMAR vs HTUS

Which is better, GMAR or HTUS?

Each has led over a different period.

GMAR has a lower expense ratio. GMAR led over 1Y, HTUS over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: GMARHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGMARHTUS
Expense Ratio0.85%Best0.96%
AUM$426M$188M
Dividend Yield0.00%1.20%
Holdings515
YTD Return+10.86%+14.21%Best
1Y Return+12.70%Best+5.39%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.63%+16.97%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+5.19%
Volatility (annualized)4.8%Best16.2%
Max Drawdown-9.1%Best-27.0%
$10,000 over 3.7 years$15,300$16,170Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionMar 17, 2023Jun 24, 2015

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 20, 2023 to Nov 13, 2026 (3.7 years).

GMAR vs HTUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.

Compare GMAR against instead:GMAR vs SPYGMAR vs QQQGMAR vs VOOGMAR vs VTIHTUS against:HTUS vs VXUS

GMAR vs HTUS Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is an ETF from Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC. Over the past year GMAR returned +12.70% while HTUS returned +5.39%. Year to date, GMAR is up 10.86% versus a gain of 14.21% for HTUS.

Over three years, GMAR compounded at +11.63% per year against +16.97% for HTUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, HTUS has the edge at +13.87% annualized vs +12.18%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

HTUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 4.8% for GMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for GMAR and -27.0% for HTUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GMAR charges 0.85% per year while HTUS charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $96 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMAR currently yields 0.00% against 1.20% for HTUS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GMAR and HTUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GMARHTUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GMAR or HTUS?

GMAR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while HTUS charges 0.96%. GMAR is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GMAR or HTUS?

Over the past year GMAR returned +12.70% vs +5.39% for HTUS, so GMAR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GMAR annualized +12.18% vs +13.87% for HTUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GMAR or HTUS?

HTUS has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 4.8% for GMAR. Worst drawdown: GMAR -9.1% vs HTUS -27.0%.

Should I hold both GMAR and HTUS?

GMAR and HTUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GMAR or HTUS?

GMAR yields 0.00% while HTUS yields 1.20%, so HTUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is HTUS better than GMAR?

GMAR has a lower expense ratio. GMAR led over 1Y, HTUS over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.