GMAY vs IVV
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GMAY or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMAY | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $515M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.09% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.53% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.79% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $14,458 | $18,953Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 19, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.3 years).
GMAY vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
GMAY vs IVV Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GMAY returned +8.53% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, GMAY is up 6.09% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, GMAY compounded at +11.79% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 6.0% for GMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for GMAY and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMAY charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMAY currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GMAY and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMAY or IVV?
GMAY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GMAY or IVV?
Over the past year GMAY returned +8.53% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GMAY or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 6.0% for GMAY. Worst drawdown: GMAY -11.8% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GMAY and IVV?
GMAY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMAY or IVV?
GMAY yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GMAY?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.