GRPZ vs IVV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GRPZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRPZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +25.84% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.74% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GRPZ vs IVV Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GRPZ returned +25.74% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, GRPZ is up 25.84% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRPZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for GRPZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRPZ charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRPZ currently yields 0.90% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GRPZ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 595 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRPZ or IVV?
GRPZ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRPZ or IVV?
Over the past year GRPZ returned +25.74% vs +22.02% for IVV, so GRPZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GRPZ annualized +13.81% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRPZ or IVV?
GRPZ has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GRPZ -27.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GRPZ and IVV?
GRPZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRPZ and IVV?
GRPZ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 595 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRPZ or IVV?
GRPZ yields 0.90% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.