GTOS vs IG
GTOS vs IG
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. GTOS delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 294 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $122M | $198M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.55% | 5.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,047 | 248 | |
| YTD Return | -0.89% | -1.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.16% | +0.84% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.51% | +4.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -23.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Principal Funds | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Apr 18, 2018 |
GTOS vs IG Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF (IG) is a ETF from Principal Funds. Over the past year GTOS returned +1.16% while IG returned +0.84%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.89% versus a loss of 1.54% for IG.
Over three years, GTOS compounded at +4.51% per year against +4.56% for IG. Across the full 4-year window we track, GTOS has the edge at +4.30% annualized vs +0.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.0% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -23.8% for IG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOS charges 0.30% per year while IG charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $19 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOS currently yields 4.55% against 5.07% for IG.
Holdings Overlap
GTOS and IG share 0 holdings out of 439 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOS or IG?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IG charges 0.19%. IG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTOS or IG?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.16% vs +0.84% for IG, so GTOS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GTOS annualized +4.30% vs +0.59% for IG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or IG?
IG has been the more volatile fund at 8.0% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs IG -23.8%.
Should I hold both GTOS and IG?
GTOS and IG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTOS and IG?
GTOS and IG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 439 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or IG?
GTOS yields 4.55% while IG yields 5.07%, so IG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.