GTOS vs IGBH
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. IGBH delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 4,130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | IGBH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.14% | |
| AUM | $124M | $233M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 5.62% | |
| Holdings | 703 | 4,130 | |
| YTD Return | -0.75% | +2.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.23% | +5.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.69% | +7.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 7.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -38.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Jul 22, 2015 |
GTOS vs IGBH Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GTOS returned +1.23% while IGBH returned +5.92%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.75% versus a gain of 2.18% for IGBH.
Over three years, GTOS compounded at +4.69% per year against +7.66% for IGBH. Across the full 4-year window we track, GTOS has the edge at +4.29% annualized vs +2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGBH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.5% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -38.9% for IGBH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOS charges 0.30% per year while IGBH charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $14 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOS currently yields 4.52% against 5.62% for IGBH.
Holdings Overlap
GTOS and IGBH share 0 holdings out of 335 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOS or IGBH?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTOS or IGBH?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.23% vs +5.92% for IGBH, so IGBH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GTOS annualized +4.29% vs +2.91% for IGBH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or IGBH?
IGBH has been the more volatile fund at 7.5% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs IGBH -38.9%.
Should I hold both GTOS and IGBH?
GTOS and IGBH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTOS and IGBH?
GTOS and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 335 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or IGBH?
GTOS yields 4.52% while IGBH yields 5.62%, so IGBH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.