GTOS vs IZRL
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. IZRL delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 703 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | IZRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $124M | $137M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 2.63% | |
| Holdings | 703 | 67 | |
| YTD Return | -0.75% | -3.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.23% | +7.20% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.69% | +15.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Dec 4, 2017 |
GTOS vs IZRL Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year GTOS returned +1.23% while IZRL returned +7.20%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.75% versus a loss of 3.33% for IZRL.
Over three years, GTOS compounded at +4.69% per year against +15.13% for IZRL. Across the full 4-year window we track, IZRL has the edge at +5.06% annualized vs +4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -60.0% for IZRL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOS charges 0.30% per year while IZRL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $49 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOS currently yields 4.52% against 2.63% for IZRL.
Holdings Overlap
GTOS and IZRL share 0 holdings out of 325 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOS or IZRL?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IZRL charges 0.49%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTOS or IZRL?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.23% vs +7.20% for IZRL, so IZRL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GTOS annualized +4.29% vs +5.06% for IZRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or IZRL?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs IZRL -60.0%.
Should I hold both GTOS and IZRL?
GTOS and IZRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTOS and IZRL?
GTOS and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 325 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or IZRL?
GTOS yields 4.52% while IZRL yields 2.63%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.