GTOS vs SAWS
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 703 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $124M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 703 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | -0.74% | +11.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.17% | +16.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.69% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 18.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Jul 30, 2024 |
GTOS vs SAWS Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year GTOS returned +1.17% while SAWS returned +16.68%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.74% versus a gain of 11.77% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOS charges 0.30% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $55 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOS currently yields 4.52% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
GTOS and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 332 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOS or SAWS?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SAWS charges 0.55%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTOS or SAWS?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.17% vs +16.68% for SAWS, so SAWS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GTOS annualized +4.30% vs +11.20% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both GTOS and SAWS?
GTOS and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTOS and SAWS?
GTOS and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 332 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or SAWS?
GTOS yields 4.52% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.